Ok, now that I have your attention (!) I am wondering about the health benefits of chocolate... I know it's recommended to have the cocoa content at least 70% cocoa mass but what percentage do you think its benefits outweigh the bad? I think about this every time I go through the check-out lines and see all the labels saying what percentage cocoa they contain!
If it was up to me, I'd eat only milk chocolate... however, I know the sugar, fat, and calories would do me absolutely no good except to put a smile on my face. I guess what I'm saying is if 60% isn't any better than milk, I'll stick with milk chocolate at 35%! Any thoughts on what the minimum cocoa percentage should be as to outweigh the bad effects?
My aunt used to eat all sorts of chocolate and even convinced herself that milk chocolate was good for you - they had Dove chocolates in bowls at her memorial service - and she lived to be in her mid-90's!
If it was up to me, I'd eat only milk chocolate... however, I know the sugar, fat, and calories would do me absolutely no good except to put a smile on my face. I guess what I'm saying is if 60% isn't any better than milk, I'll stick with milk chocolate at 35%! Any thoughts on what the minimum cocoa percentage should be as to outweigh the bad effects?
My aunt used to eat all sorts of chocolate and even convinced herself that milk chocolate was good for you - they had Dove chocolates in bowls at her memorial service - and she lived to be in her mid-90's!