richard-in-cincy
Well-known member
This thing has landed on the precious real estate of my kitchen counters, taking up a huge amount of space, and I hate it. I don't understand why I need it or would want to go through the extra (yes extra) effort of using the thing. My other half bought this as a house Christmas present (without my input obviously) and now thinks we need to start using it.
I have refused. Not that I'm opposed to new technology or learning new ways. I've looked through the manual on how to use it, read through lots of the recipes, and I still am shaking my head asking "why?".
So last night we made a recipe.from the cookbook: Basque-style Chicken. After every bowl in the house was dirtied to hold all of the prepped ingredients, and to remove them from the cooker in the very small batches you have to sear/saute things in and the constant resetting of menu commands, we're eating the dish.
"So, it's pretty good isn't it?"
I said "it's fine, but I could have made this on top of the stove in my dutch oven in half the time with half the mess and the bacon would have edible".
Instead of all the small batches of sautéing, removing, repeat, remove, repeat, I could have just done it all at the same time, added the final ingredients, turned down the heat (one temperature adjustment), put on the lid and forgot about it.
Plus, the recipe was woefully inaccurate on cooking times, everything was saute for 30 seconds, remove. Bacon sautéed for 30 seconds is still raw bacon (and it was like rubber in the finished dish--I actually did not eat the bacon bits in my portion--for shame).
Every recipe I've looked at in the cookbook is like this. All this extra fuss, extra steps, doing what used to be 1 task in 3-6 or more different steps, for what? So some corporations can make lots of money selling us something that we don't need, that makes our food preparation harder, and we're gullible enough to go out and buy it because its shiny and new?
Am I missing something here?
I have refused. Not that I'm opposed to new technology or learning new ways. I've looked through the manual on how to use it, read through lots of the recipes, and I still am shaking my head asking "why?".
So last night we made a recipe.from the cookbook: Basque-style Chicken. After every bowl in the house was dirtied to hold all of the prepped ingredients, and to remove them from the cooker in the very small batches you have to sear/saute things in and the constant resetting of menu commands, we're eating the dish.
"So, it's pretty good isn't it?"
I said "it's fine, but I could have made this on top of the stove in my dutch oven in half the time with half the mess and the bacon would have edible".
Instead of all the small batches of sautéing, removing, repeat, remove, repeat, I could have just done it all at the same time, added the final ingredients, turned down the heat (one temperature adjustment), put on the lid and forgot about it.
Plus, the recipe was woefully inaccurate on cooking times, everything was saute for 30 seconds, remove. Bacon sautéed for 30 seconds is still raw bacon (and it was like rubber in the finished dish--I actually did not eat the bacon bits in my portion--for shame).
Every recipe I've looked at in the cookbook is like this. All this extra fuss, extra steps, doing what used to be 1 task in 3-6 or more different steps, for what? So some corporations can make lots of money selling us something that we don't need, that makes our food preparation harder, and we're gullible enough to go out and buy it because its shiny and new?
Am I missing something here?