We so enjoyed it and the pork roast was one of the best I've done in a long time, very tender and not dried out.
I used a 2.75 lb pork rib end roast, bone in, from the freezer. I didn't have red potatoes and was afraid the russets would dissolve to mush with that much cooking, so scrubbed, halved and baked along with the pork/sauerkraut. I was really laughing to myself when I threw the cilantro in (what kind of fusion cooking do you call this?), thinking if I saw this in a magazine I probably wouldn't try it. But as I trust you, I forged ahead. What a wonderful combo it was.
Now, a question. I have a sort of all purpose Scan Pan, about 10 inches across and with 4 inch high sides I use for about everything. I decided to brown the roast first because I wasn't sure with it being smaller and not a boneless rolled one that I would want to cook it that long uncovered. So I used that pot for the entire dish, as it has a cover and everything fit nicely. This allowed the roast to be more than half submerged in the liquid which helped with the tenderness, I'm sure. But there was still liquid in the pan when I finished the cooking cycle. If I had spread it out in a larger pan, would the liquid have cooked off? I'm wondering if by using the smaller pan, I had a different outcome.
In any case, this recipe is definitely a keeper, we absolutely loved it. I see it is already in the Hall of Fame, deservedly so...Thanks again.
http://www.finerkitchens.com/swap/forum15/27_Moms_Great_Pork_Roast_and_Sauerkraut
I used a 2.75 lb pork rib end roast, bone in, from the freezer. I didn't have red potatoes and was afraid the russets would dissolve to mush with that much cooking, so scrubbed, halved and baked along with the pork/sauerkraut. I was really laughing to myself when I threw the cilantro in (what kind of fusion cooking do you call this?), thinking if I saw this in a magazine I probably wouldn't try it. But as I trust you, I forged ahead. What a wonderful combo it was.
Now, a question. I have a sort of all purpose Scan Pan, about 10 inches across and with 4 inch high sides I use for about everything. I decided to brown the roast first because I wasn't sure with it being smaller and not a boneless rolled one that I would want to cook it that long uncovered. So I used that pot for the entire dish, as it has a cover and everything fit nicely. This allowed the roast to be more than half submerged in the liquid which helped with the tenderness, I'm sure. But there was still liquid in the pan when I finished the cooking cycle. If I had spread it out in a larger pan, would the liquid have cooked off? I'm wondering if by using the smaller pan, I had a different outcome.
In any case, this recipe is definitely a keeper, we absolutely loved it. I see it is already in the Hall of Fame, deservedly so...Thanks again.
http://www.finerkitchens.com/swap/forum15/27_Moms_Great_Pork_Roast_and_Sauerkraut