hey dawn! the swap in its wisdom decided i don't have permission to reply to your message(?!)...

R

rvb

Well-known member
it's prolly that mimi had the final straw with my non-food posts.

smileys/wink.gif>

in post 3339, i was referring to a group of vicious people back in the old days at gail's who decided that any non-food stuff was very bad.

needles(sic) to say, they did their best to annoy us righteous folk. one person posted that i was prostitutiong the swap with chat. i guess she thought i'd be annoyed.

i was. about the same amount as though i heard a fly buzz through the room on its way to the window.

 
I'g think he had me confused with Cyn, but she asked her question after this post...

maybe he was referring to my PM to him.

I do remember those days when people got annoyed when someone didn't put "nt" in the title. But that was before the days of quicker connections. And with Mimi's great function of the automatic "NT", problem solved all around :eek:)

 
How dull our forum would be without the travelogues and photos of precious ones and gardens and MS

rants(I mean ventings) and lovely black swans and poetry and musings----my life is better for it. Just MHO.

 
I remember that one

If it's the same one... started with a very charming regular posting about a ski trip, if I recall correctly.

I think that's the same one during which I spoke critically of people who are regular posters under a known 'name', hiding in all kinds of other names to argue, you know- stand behind your words basically... and someone tried to jump me for having a made up name. I love it when they hand you their own head.

It's so very much better here. Thank you Mimi. Oh, and all this time I thought you were the sticky chicken Mimi lol.

 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top