I came across this article regarding plastics.

dawn_mo

Well-known member
Wal-Mart Bans BPA, Other Retailers Likely to Follow

Studies link the chemical to possible hormonal changes

By Truman Lewis

ConsumerAffairs.com

April 18, 2008

Wal-Mart says it will stop selling baby bottles made with the controversial chemical bisphenol A -- commonly known as BPA -- in its U.S. stores early next year.

The announcement followed the release of a draft report from the U.S. National Toxicology Program that expressed concern that BPA, used to make plastic, could cause behavioral changes in infants and children and trigger the early onset of puberty in females.

Meanwhile, a new study found that BPA can alter the activity of genes in normal breast cells in ways that resemble what is found in extremely dangerous breast cancers.

The study, conducted by researchers in California and published this month in the journal Cancer Research, found that many genes in non-cancerous breast cells exposed to trace amounts of BPA began acting in a way that closely resembled the gene activity in highly aggressive breast tumors that led to an increased likelihood that women would die of the disease.

BPA is one of the most widely used synthetic chemicals in modern industry. It is the basic building block for polycarbonate, the see-through, shatterproof plastic that resembles glass. It's also used to make the epoxy resins lining most tin cans, along with some dental sealants, sports helmets and compact discs.

Canada first

Wal-Mart announced on Wednesday that it would halt sales of baby bottles, sippy cups, pacifiers, food containers and water bottles made with BPA in its Canadian stores, following reports that Canadian health authorities would soon declare the chemical a health hazard. On Thursday, Wal-Mart expanded the ban to its U.S. stores.

Earlier this week, it was reported that Health Canada had concluded that BPA is a dangerous substance, the first national government to make that determination. Health Minister Tony Clement is expected to impose restrictions on its use soon.

Other retailers are likely to follow Wal-Mart's action. Target said it is testing glass baby bottles. Babies R Us said it began selling glass bottles and BPA-free bottles late last year.

The latest findings are "highly supportive of the concept that overexposure to BPA and/or similar compounds could be an underlying factor in the aggressiveness, if not in the causality" of breast cancers, said Shanaz Dairkee, lead author of the study and senior scientist at the California Pacific Medical Center Research Institute in San Francisco, Canada's Globe and Mail reported.

The study results were designated a "priority report" by the journal, published by the American Association for Cancer Research, one of the world's largest scientific organizations devoted to cancer studies.

The American Chemistry Council, an industry group, said news reports about BPA are "unnecessarily confusing and frightening the public."

http://www.consumeraffairs.com/news04/2008/04/bpa.html

 
Go figure...

"---The American Chemistry Council, an industry group, said news reports about BPA are "unnecessarily confusing and frightening the public."

Note the key words: "Industry Group"

In my opinion, this is a very worthy post Dawn.

Thanks!

 
I assumed the ban was also looming in the US - here in Canada>>

it's been a little over a year since BPA first made national headlines. I recall seeing a group, started by mothers, who had been compiling research & pushing the government agencies to do something about it. The biggest risk is the baby bottles.........yikes!

In our family, our reusable water bottles have now been replaced with stainless steel bottles with screw top lids.

I am a chemical engineer by traning/profession, & around the time I graduated from university in 1996, I recall stating that plastics, for the use with foods, would be banned in our lifetime. A few years ago, the warnings about microwaving fatty foods in plastics surfaced, & now BPA.

 
My wife and I recently discussed how young girls are looking more like adults these days...

...and it seems to be happening at a younger and younger age.

We thought about fashion and how young kids are dressing differently these days, and that may be part of the perception. Then my wife pointed out that low-rise jeans have been around since the '60's (remember "hip-huggers"?), and halter tops and bare midriffs as well.

So, if fashion isn't so much to blame, what is? We both agreed that 11 and 12-year-old girls sure didn't look the way they do now when we were young. Not all girls, mind you. But there seems to be many, many more young girls starting puberty in the 10 to 11-year-old bracket than ever before. By the time they're 12 or 13 they look like grown women.

Totally un-scientific conclusion, of course, but we believe that the early onset of puberty may be related to the plastics thing and all the hormones in meats at the meat counter.

It can't be good for these kids.

Michael

 
Agreed. It seems that as a society, we are having an increasingly hard time...

...deciding what is morally acceptable and what isn't.

Knowingly hurting others for profitable gain is not in the gray area for me.

Michael

 
The FDA seems to be hot and cold on this issue -- the media warns us then comforts us.

The goal is to keep us off balance and dependent on them for all knowledge. Pfaaafffff

 
Back
Top