While reading Ina Garten's latest Barefoot Contessa Foolproof: Recipes You Can Trust, I saw a full-size photo of a beautiful pound cake with the perfect thin crust on all surfaces. So beautiful that I took the book over the Larry and pointed this out like it was the Holy Grail of Cakes.
Spurred by this vision of perfection, I tried to duplicate this recipe last night, carefully following the non-traditional steps she mandates: start with a cold oven; beat the thrice-sifted cake flour for 3 minutes after it has been added to the rest of the batter.
I chose to bake the batter in two bread pans which is an option she offers, so I didn't invalidate the method by doing this. It took 67 minutes (not 50-55) to probe-test crumbs rather than wet batter. The crust looked beautiful, but then I noticed it start to crack. And crack. And THEN I noticed that there was a gap between the perfect baked cake and the perfect baked crust.
Perfect Pound Cake? I think not.
And it wasn't a tiny gap. This was a honkin' 1/2" gap which couldn't be pressed back down because it had baked into a thin crispy cookie layer that shattered when moved. The crust had totally separated from the cake base by forming a self-supporting shell over the loaf--much like the enchanted protective shield over Hogwarts or volcanic magna which cools into a dangerously thin sheet over molten lava that can sear your flesh off.
Yep...just like that. Only with sugar and fat.
Who can you trust when "recipes you can trust" can't be trusted? I brought the "perfect pound cake" into work, but it is a sad, anemic-looking thing. Mainly because the "golden brown crust" that makes a cake a cake is sitting in my garbage can.
Click on the link to see Ina's recipe at Williams Sonoma and the exact photo that seduced me into wasting a cup of heavy cream, 6 eggs, a cup of butter, 2.5 cups of sugar and 3 cups of Swan cake flour. Oh, and a vanilla bean. Please note there is NOT a half-inch separation of crust:cake in this photo.
Liar. Liar. Pants on fire.
http://www.williams-sonoma.com/recipe/perfect-pound-cake.html
Spurred by this vision of perfection, I tried to duplicate this recipe last night, carefully following the non-traditional steps she mandates: start with a cold oven; beat the thrice-sifted cake flour for 3 minutes after it has been added to the rest of the batter.
I chose to bake the batter in two bread pans which is an option she offers, so I didn't invalidate the method by doing this. It took 67 minutes (not 50-55) to probe-test crumbs rather than wet batter. The crust looked beautiful, but then I noticed it start to crack. And crack. And THEN I noticed that there was a gap between the perfect baked cake and the perfect baked crust.
Perfect Pound Cake? I think not.
And it wasn't a tiny gap. This was a honkin' 1/2" gap which couldn't be pressed back down because it had baked into a thin crispy cookie layer that shattered when moved. The crust had totally separated from the cake base by forming a self-supporting shell over the loaf--much like the enchanted protective shield over Hogwarts or volcanic magna which cools into a dangerously thin sheet over molten lava that can sear your flesh off.
Yep...just like that. Only with sugar and fat.
Who can you trust when "recipes you can trust" can't be trusted? I brought the "perfect pound cake" into work, but it is a sad, anemic-looking thing. Mainly because the "golden brown crust" that makes a cake a cake is sitting in my garbage can.
Click on the link to see Ina's recipe at Williams Sonoma and the exact photo that seduced me into wasting a cup of heavy cream, 6 eggs, a cup of butter, 2.5 cups of sugar and 3 cups of Swan cake flour. Oh, and a vanilla bean. Please note there is NOT a half-inch separation of crust:cake in this photo.
Liar. Liar. Pants on fire.
http://www.williams-sonoma.com/recipe/perfect-pound-cake.html