One more question (well, I hope it's my last ?) on the Cook The Book Challange.

orchid

Well-known member
Do we have guide lines on staying true to the recipe? As in "I substituted "this" and "this" etc. and then saying I didn't much like it". I have a real problem with that. If I am thinking about trying a recipe and a essential ingredient is Sherry vinegar and I use Balsamic it isn't going to be even close to what the recipe should taste like. Right? Now I don't mean like using dried oregano for fresh. That isn't straying from the original very far. What does everyone think?

 
I'm my group, we stick to the recipe. No substitutions allowed unless the author says

so in a sub note. (We recently did an herb book and the author recommended other herbs you could use instead.)

The point, in my opinion, is to try the recipe as the author intended. Substitutions can alter things dramatically.

 
I've been wondering this too, but then I came to the conclusion that if we are cooking from

a specific book to report on a recipe, we should stick to the recipe as written. I'm thinking of trying the colcannon recipe and somewhere I read that someone made it with leeks instead of cabbage, which I want to try, as well. If I do go ahead with this recipe, I will make it with cabbage first, as it is written.

 
I think that's a good idea. Also, I'd like to note if the directions are comprehensive. A long-time

baker/cook may automatically do unwritten steps that a novice would be unaware are necessary.

It would nice to know whether it's helpful to novices, a Master Class book or some happy place in-between.

 
I have done this elsewhere and it is really interesting--a recipe

I did, I KNEW the cooking time wasn't going to work correctly as written, but did it as told!! Also, the picture of the dish in the book was far different--but we all know that, don't we!! LOL

 
Back
Top