Secrets to making a GOOD GRAVY

G

Guest

Guest
I never used to pay gravy much respect. When my mom made gravy, I called it "lump casserole." My grandmother's efforts were often referred to (lovingly, of course) as "the big wet blanket." Assuming that my gene pool didn't include much of a gravy bone, I avoided gravy-making for years, arguing that a great turkey doesn't need it. But this year, I finally decided to shake off the family curse. I set out to create a full-bodied gravy that would radiate an intense turkey ness without setting up like concrete.

Before shopping for ingredients or breaking out any pans, I dug into some history books. Once upon a time in Europe, big hunks of critter were usually cooked via boiling. Not wanting to waste a molecule of the cooking water, the cook would season the liquid liberally with spices (gravy comes from an Old French word for spice) and thicken it with ground almonds or bread before ladling it over the beast.

Later, roasting became prevalent in Europe, and gravy simply came to mean meat drippings — otherwise known as jus. It was easy to make, so it's no wonder that gravy came to mean anything gained with little or no effort. Today, we still use the word that way — but not usually in reference to the gravy served at Thanksgiving dinner. That's because modern cooks have added thickeners to the gravy equation, making matters a bit more complicated.

The Science Behind Thickening

Let's take a moment to ponder the mechanics of starch thickening. When exposed to a hot liquid (say, broth), starch granules (say, flour, cornstarch, or tapioca) explode, sending out a tangle of snakelike molecules that create a 3-D mesh. This mesh traps the liquid, thickening it into a kind of gel.

The problem with starch is that you can't just dump it into a hot liquid. If you do, the first grains that hit the liquid immediately swell and glue together, creating gummy orbs that are usually full of dry particles. I don't know exactly what scientists call these orbs, but regular folk call them lumps. Cooks invented the roux and the slurry to get around the lumps.

Roux

This thickening agent is made by melting butter or other fat in a pan and whisking in flour, then cooking said flour until it loses its raw flavor. When the roux is ready, the stock is added. The strategy is to coat every granule of flour with butter. Since the water in stock hates fat, it's as though each starch grain is wearing a buttery wet suit to protect against overzealous gelatinization. As you cook the roux, the fat melts off and the starches, if they've been whisked properly, can go about their thickening business. Cajun and Creole cooks also figured out that you can deepen the flavor of the finished sauce by cooking the roux until it looks like a chocolate-brown mole.

But roux are rife with problems. They have to cook for a while, with frequent stirring, to rid the flour of its raw cereal taste. Roux are imprecise because their thickening power decreases as they cook. Last but not least, a roux's scalding, clingy properties make it rather hazardous to handle. Hence the nickname for the darkest of roux, Cajun Napalm.

Slurry

Another common starch-delivery device is the slurry. Instead of working the starch-containing powder into fat, the starch is suspended in cold liquid and shaken up like a pitcher of Martinis. This so-called slurry is then whisked quickly into the simmering liquid. As the liquid comes back to a simmer, the starch will do its thing — lump-free.

But slurries have their own set of issues. Because you're adding the slurry at the very end of the gravy-making process, the raw taste of the flour won't have time to cook out. Sure, you can use cornstarch to get around that, but cornstarch-thickened sauces tend to be overly shiny — and that makes for downright creepy gravy.

"Schmaltz Manié"

My recipe doesn't avoid starch altogether. Starch is good — starch works. I just have a more reliable and precise version: a modified beurre manié.

A beurre manié is like a roux in that it contains flour and butter, but instead of cooking them together, you simply knead them into a paste off-heat (beurre manié means "kneaded butter" in French). Traditionally, you add this paste by teaspoonfuls to the simmering liquid until the desired viscosity is reached, but I find that rolling the paste into balls helps me control the thickening even more precisely.

Speaking of paste, mine's made from flour and chicken fat (known as schmaltz in Yiddish) instead of butter. Why? To up the birdy flavor of the gravy considerably. Where do I get the chicken fat? Homemade stock.

Stock-making

Stock making is something of a lost art because it requires carcasses, the bones and joints of which are packed with collagen; when cooked with moisture, collagen converts to lip-smacking gelatin. Most of us don't do a lot of butchering these days, so we're carcass poor. Luckily, both chicken and turkey wings are available in abundance. And we can make the stock and schmaltz manié days ahead of time.

Making the Stock

Buy 3 1/4 pounds of chicken wings or turkey wings. They're cheap, easy to find, and packed with connective tissue that can be coaxed into gelatin. Roast the wings and transfer them to a stockpot. Add water, onions, celery, carrots, and a few sprigs of fresh herbs. Bring the mixture to a boil, then let it simmer until reduced by half. Strain the stock and chill it overnight.

Rolling the Schmaltz Manié

The next day, a wondrous thing will be revealed. A rather thick disk of fat will have formed like a lid on top of the stock. This is the schmaltz, and it's packed with poultry flavor. Break it into pieces, then mix in an equal amount of flour to form a smooth paste. Chill the schmaltz manié, then roll it into half-inch balls. Although these little magic bullets can be kept in the refrigerator up to two days before T-Day, I usually bag, tag, and freeze them for convenience.

Deglazing the Turkey Pan

When the turkey comes out of the oven, pour any liquids that have accumulated in the roasting pan into a fat separator. Heat the drained roasting pan over two burners and add white wine. With a little scraping from a wooden spoon, the wine will dissolve the fond (browned bits), which is crucial for gravy flavor development. Deglazing will also make the pan a lot easier to clean later, by the way.

Stir in the degreased pan juices from the separator (tasting as you go if using brined drippings), some chopped herbs, and your stock. Bring to a boil. Ask your sous-chef to pour the remaining turkey fat over your dog's food, and watch him or her chase the bowl across the room.

Thickening the Gravy

Remove the schmaltz manié from the fridge and add to the pan one ball at a time, whisking constantly until the sauce thickens to your liking. Season the gravy with salt (brined bird drippings probably won't need any) and pepper. Pour it into your gravy boat and it's ladles ahoy.

 
My grandmother, bless her, used to say...

When she made gravy she stirred it all up and when she had lumps, she said she was serving "Country Gravy" and with her rich pan dripping gravy, bless her, we ate it with relish, lumps and all, and were damned glad we had it.

The lumps were few and far between, but when she was hurried they would appear. When she announced "Country Gravy" I would sheepishly look up at her, knowing her secrets, she would wink, and the assembled masses ate "Country Gravy."

And now I have a stick blender.

 
My Father had the best secret for making perfect gravy...A SLICE OF BREAD

He would use a SLICE OF BREAD, instead of flour, use the drippings, vegetables, and then a slice of bread, put it all in a blender and... Perfect. No lumps and I found it delicious. and to me there is nothing better than a slice of bread with gravy (almost redundit but......... ummmmm so so so good)

 
I gotta say, my mother always used the slurry method; I have never tasted raw flour taste. . .

. . . using the slurry method because I was always taught to boil it after it is mixed into the drippings/water/broth mixture for a couple of minutes.

Slurry is very easy, just don't dump it into a boiling pan and since you won't be pre-cooking the flour, make sure you boil as above and make sure your pan drippings are nice and brown.

Easy and good.

 
And MY mom browned the dickens out of the flour, for flavour, before adding the liquid. If we get

enough moms in here, we might have a sure-fire method yet.

 
Is it really? I always thought my father made it up actually

I'm sure he believed he did.. But does it make sense to you? I've tried it a few times but I could never master it like my father did, though he explained it to us girls (3 of us) and I've watched him do it too, sad he is here to tell me. He was an excellent cook, I could tell you so many humorous stories.

 
Marg, I think you may be on to something there.

I grew up with the slurry method and never had the Grossmutter ever stirred it into the skillet to brown. On occasion she browned the flour in the oven for the big holiday roasts, BUT ONLY for holidays I might add. What is it about that??? Why only for holidays? I suspect it's the German thing. Don't get your hopes up like every weekend; it's only for holidays.

But the steady stirred pastes of flour and milk into the fat drippings were the most amazing part of the meal for me. The unctuousness of it all!

 
Speaking of unctuousness...so late for spelling...I too, brown all flour now for all but poultry

gravy. She set the flavour preferences and they last forever. Only poultry gravy is white, not well browned (I do it a little) and it's made with milk.

 
From what I've read, there is a double standard: Flour added at the last minute, as in a pan sauce

or a beurre maniere, doesn't taste "floury," BUT once it cooks a while, as in a roux, it does take on a floury taste, and it has to cook a while longer to get rid of it.

I think that browning the flour beforehand is more about caramelized flavor and not "whitening" the sauce than preventing a floury taste. No matter what, a 10-minute simmer would get rid of it. Somewhere I have a passage by Richard Olney on the subject of floury-ness, full of compound sentences and wry wit, but it's late and I'm sleepy....

 
I think I was misleading. Too late maybe. I brown the flour with the meat fat, not on its own, so

in this case, it's the flavour of the meat that is intensifying. The combination of the almost burning flour and fat is what creates the tasty gravy. I think I went through life thinking that was the way everyone made gravy.

I'm going to have to start rereading what I've written just for my own understanding.

 
I guess you are probably adding a dimension to your gravy, but. . .

If you have a roast with good, brown drippings, you will have good gravy no matter how you make it!

Geeze, we have never simmered gravy for 10 minutes, ever!

 
Back
Top