I posted this at Gail's years ago...
marg/cdn: Finally found my previous post. I should note that we started with a 4" binder....
Posted: May 3, 2003 10:44 AM
I posted this last year. It was a review of a very helpful system put together on the sly, by my husband.
Part of a response... A Christmas present from my husband last year, was a HUGE binder filled with indices and tabbed sections of recipes that he photocopied for me, (including the recipes)those tried and those marked to try, categorized by food type. He also photocopied all my F&W, Saveur, Saveurs, Epicure and BA indices back to the mid 70s (depending on when the magazines came to market) so that I could access things that might have stuck in my memory. When we feel like something particular, we go to the binder and fnd it under that category. It then gets scored on 3 scales: degree of difficulty, prep time and just how much we liked it. If it does not make a 7 out of 10 on the like scale, it gets chucked. It is only part of an answer to how you get to them all, but it does make it easy to access them when you do have the inclination to try something new. the index is kept up to date but the binder is so full now, that the index is now in its own separate binder. He also indexed the already-tried recipes that I had marked in various of my favourite books as he was nervous that I might some day be unable to remember where these favourites could be found. Now just how much does he like eating?!! Thoughtful gift wasn't it? And I didn't even wonder what he was doing at the photocopier every night after midnight. (Well, who would have guessed?)
So as part of the, I suspect, unanticipated gift, he must continue to categorize recipes and make sure that the index is updated. I keep everything in my computer according to categories but he is responsible for hard copies.
And just recently, I have become brave enough to just throw out recipes that do no hit 8 our of 10 on the second round.
And he has found that the dessert category has become so voluminous that another binder was necessary.