Guinness Beer Chocolate Cake test: The outcome?
I would make
NEITHER of these cupcakes again. Full disclosure: after tasting the cupcakes, I am not wasting ingredients making the icings. Possibly that addition makes a difference, but I'm not going down that path. This test is done.
The one on the left is Nigella's:
This cake is magnificent in its damp blackness. I can't say that you can absolutely taste the stout in it, but there is certainly a resonant, ferrous tang which I happen to love. The best way of describing it is to say that it's like gingerbread without the spices. There is enough sugar — a...
www.nigella.com
...and the one on the right is Cook's Illustrated (screenshot):
PROS:
Both cakes were easy to make: no mixer involved. Variations of: melt butter with chocolate, add egg mixture, add flour mixture.
The CI has a lovely top.
CONS:
Nigella's first bite was initially okay, but as I continued to chew, realized the crumb was stiff, dense, and slightly chalky with a cloying taste. It also had a slight depression in every cupcake.
CI's was overwhelmingly "molasses-y" to the point that I could not even finish the taste test. I am NOT a fan of molasses and the only sugars in this are molasses and brown sugar, which ALSO has molasses overtones, so that biased me. The addition of powdered malt flavor was totally lost due to this issue.
Sadly (for my thighs) the hunt for the perfect chocolate cupcake continues.
PS: Confusingly, I could make a .pdf file from the snapshot, but when loaded, it would not open.