My bed-ridden 90-year old neighbor (on Hospice for 2 years, God Bless her) has been craving butterscotch pudding. And so even though I don't like butterscotch and have never--to my recollection--eaten butterscotch pudding (and WHY WOULD I in a world that contains chocolate pudding???) I am a pit bull when it comes to meeting a challenge head-on.
So far I've made 4 different versions and the only consistency is that they all have the word "butterscotch" in their title.
First off was the butterscotch bourbon pie filling from Magpie Bakery because well...I'm me and it sounded really interesting even if it wasn't exactly pudding. However, even though I've never actually eaten butterscotch pudding, I just knew this one wasn't right. Too cloyingly sweet and too dense.
Next came a recipe from Epicurious called "Old Fashioned Butterscotch Pudding". (Thanks, Maria!) I thought this one might be it because at least the adjectives pointed in the right direction.
Wrong again. In no way is this a pudding in the way that I know pudding. It's heavy cream, egg yolks, butter and sugar coddled in a bain marie. It's the love child conceived during an affair between French crème brulee and Mexican flan. It is delicious, utterly smooth and creamy. But a pudding that could trigger the memories of a 90-year old it is not.
Then I found two recipes and waffled between which one might do it: Smitten Kitchen or Pioneer Woman? Both simply called their recipe "Butterscotch Pudding" yet one had egg yolks and the other had none. One had butter and the other had none. Both used 3 cups of milk and 3 TBL of corn starch but SK used 1/2 C of brown sugar while PW used 1.5 C of brown sugar. THREE TIMES THE AMOUNT!
Since I'd already gone through 9 egg yolks, I opted for SK's with less sugar and no eggs. The result in a few words: Slightly thin & anemic-looking but more disturbing >> BORING.
At this point I realized that the mental benchmark flavor I was expecting to reach was a Werther's butterscotch candy in pudding form.
Oh, a hurricane hit midstream and I ran out of eggs, so the last test wasn't made until Sunday when Publix restocked their cold cases. I whipped up PW's version, but since the SK had turned out so thin, I halved the recipe, but increased the cornstarch by 1 TBL. While warm, the result was the best of the four in flavor and appearance, but after sitting overnight in the refrigerator, it was TOO thick. PW's adds egg yolks so I shouldn't have increased the cornstarch.
Haven't heard from the neighbor's daughter yet, but when I handed her the still warm PW batch Sunday evening, Dianne said: "You know. Mom's mother wasn't a very good cook so it's possible that what Mom remembers is just boxed butterscotch pudding."
Huh.
Anyone in the market for a pit bull with elevated cholesterol and sugar levels?
http://www.offthemenublog.com/recipes-new/butterscotch-bourbon-pie
So far I've made 4 different versions and the only consistency is that they all have the word "butterscotch" in their title.
First off was the butterscotch bourbon pie filling from Magpie Bakery because well...I'm me and it sounded really interesting even if it wasn't exactly pudding. However, even though I've never actually eaten butterscotch pudding, I just knew this one wasn't right. Too cloyingly sweet and too dense.
Next came a recipe from Epicurious called "Old Fashioned Butterscotch Pudding". (Thanks, Maria!) I thought this one might be it because at least the adjectives pointed in the right direction.
Wrong again. In no way is this a pudding in the way that I know pudding. It's heavy cream, egg yolks, butter and sugar coddled in a bain marie. It's the love child conceived during an affair between French crème brulee and Mexican flan. It is delicious, utterly smooth and creamy. But a pudding that could trigger the memories of a 90-year old it is not.
Then I found two recipes and waffled between which one might do it: Smitten Kitchen or Pioneer Woman? Both simply called their recipe "Butterscotch Pudding" yet one had egg yolks and the other had none. One had butter and the other had none. Both used 3 cups of milk and 3 TBL of corn starch but SK used 1/2 C of brown sugar while PW used 1.5 C of brown sugar. THREE TIMES THE AMOUNT!
Since I'd already gone through 9 egg yolks, I opted for SK's with less sugar and no eggs. The result in a few words: Slightly thin & anemic-looking but more disturbing >> BORING.
At this point I realized that the mental benchmark flavor I was expecting to reach was a Werther's butterscotch candy in pudding form.
Oh, a hurricane hit midstream and I ran out of eggs, so the last test wasn't made until Sunday when Publix restocked their cold cases. I whipped up PW's version, but since the SK had turned out so thin, I halved the recipe, but increased the cornstarch by 1 TBL. While warm, the result was the best of the four in flavor and appearance, but after sitting overnight in the refrigerator, it was TOO thick. PW's adds egg yolks so I shouldn't have increased the cornstarch.
Haven't heard from the neighbor's daughter yet, but when I handed her the still warm PW batch Sunday evening, Dianne said: "You know. Mom's mother wasn't a very good cook so it's possible that what Mom remembers is just boxed butterscotch pudding."
Huh.
Anyone in the market for a pit bull with elevated cholesterol and sugar levels?
http://www.offthemenublog.com/recipes-new/butterscotch-bourbon-pie